Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client's authentication of the server during TLS handshakes.
Metrics
Affected Vendors & Products
Advisories
No advisories yet.
Fixes
Solution
No solution given by the vendor.
Workaround
No workaround given by the vendor.
References
| Link | Providers |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/9754 |
|
History
Fri, 20 Mar 2026 09:00:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| First Time appeared |
Wolfssl
Wolfssl wolfssl |
|
| Vendors & Products |
Wolfssl
Wolfssl wolfssl |
Thu, 19 Mar 2026 21:15:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client's authentication of the server during TLS handshakes. | |
| Title | Improper key_share validation in TLS 1.3 HelloRetryRequest | |
| Weaknesses | CWE-20 | |
| References |
| |
| Metrics |
cvssV4_0
|
Projects
Sign in to view the affected projects.
Status: PUBLISHED
Assigner: wolfSSL
Published:
Updated: 2026-03-19T20:59:54.021Z
Reserved: 2026-02-25T20:42:49.228Z
Link: CVE-2026-3230
No data.
Status : Awaiting Analysis
Published: 2026-03-19T21:17:12.483
Modified: 2026-03-20T13:39:46.493
Link: CVE-2026-3230
No data.
OpenCVE Enrichment
Updated: 2026-03-20T11:06:14Z
Weaknesses