| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Integer signedness error in the virtio_net_load function in hw/net/virtio-net.c in QEMU 1.x before 1.7.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted savevm image, which triggers a buffer overflow. |
| The virtio_net_load function in hw/net/virtio-net.c in QEMU 1.5.0 through 1.7.x before 1.7.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code via vectors in which the value of curr_queues is greater than max_queues, which triggers an out-of-bounds write. |
| Buffer overflow in the idnsALookup function in dns_internal.cc in Squid 3.2 through 3.2.11 and 3.3 through 3.3.6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and server termination) via a long name in a DNS lookup request. |
| Buffer overflow in iNotes in IBM Domino 8.5.3 before FP5 IF1 and 9.0 before IF4 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, aka SPR PTHN9ADPA8. |
| Buffer overflow in MedCoreD.sys in AhnLab V3 Internet Security 8.0.7.5 (Build 1373) allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted 0xA3350014 IOCTL call. |
| IBM Lotus Sametime 8.5.2 and 8.5.2.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (WebPlayer Firefox extension crash) via a crafted Audio Visual (AV) session. |
| Memory corruption when preparing a shared memory notification for a memparcel in Resource Manager. |
| Memory corruption when keymaster operation imports a shared key. |
| Improper restriction of write operations in SNP firmware could allow a malicious hypervisor to potentially overwrite a guest's memory or UMC seed resulting in loss of confidentiality and integrity. |
| Improper restriction of write operations in SNP firmware could allow a malicious hypervisor to overwrite a guest's UMC seed potentially allowing reading of memory from a decommissioned guest. |
| Memory corruption during session sign renewal request calls in HLOS. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| This is a duplicate of an earlier CVE, CVE-2022-47069. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-15098. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2019-15098. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-15098 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue in the originally named product. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-10542. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-10542. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-10542 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5583. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5583. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5583 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2788. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2788. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2788 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
