| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Memory corruption while triggering commands in the PlayReady Trusted application. |
| Memory corruption during the FRS UDS generation process. |
| Memory corruption while processing a message, when the buffer is controlled by a Guest VM, the value can be changed continuously. |
| A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker with privilege level 15 to elevate privileges to root on the underlying operating system of an affected device.
This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation when processing specific configuration commands. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by including crafted input in specific configuration commands. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to elevate privileges to root on the underlying operating system of an affected device. The security impact rating (SIR) of this advisory has been raised to High because an attacker could gain access to the underlying operating system of the affected device and perform potentially undetected actions.
Note: The attacker must have privileges to enter configuration mode on the affected device. This is usually referred to as privilege level 15. |
| The issue was addressed with improved input sanitization. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.5. An app may be able to gain elevated privileges. |
| The issue was addressed with improved input sanitization. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.4, macOS Ventura 13.7.6, macOS Sonoma 14.7.6. An app may be able to gain elevated privileges. |
| Improper input validation in Windows Common Log File System Driver allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| A path handling issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 17 and iPadOS 17, macOS Sonoma 14. An app may be able to break out of its sandbox. |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: JSSE). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE:8u441, 8u441-perf, 11.0.26, 17.0.14, 21.0.6, 24; Oracle GraalVM for JDK:17.0.14, 21.0.6, 24; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition:20.3.17 and 21.3.13. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition accessible data. Note: This vulnerability can be exploited by using APIs in the specified Component, e.g., through a web service which supplies data to the APIs. This vulnerability also applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| ColdFusion versions 2025.1, 2023.13, 2021.19 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A high-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security mechanisms and execute code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction and scope is changed. |
| ColdFusion versions 2025.1, 2023.13, 2021.19 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A high-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security mechanisms and execute code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction and scope is changed. |
| Improper input validation in the UEFI firmware DXE module for the Intel(R) Server D50DNP and M50FCP boards may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| Improper input validation in the UEFI firmware error handler for the Intel(R) Server D50DNP and M50FCP may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| Dell ECS version 3.8.1.4 and prior contain an Improper Input Validation vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution. |
| An attacker with control over a content process could potentially leverage the privileged UITour actor to leak sensitive information or escalate privileges. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 138 and Thunderbird < 138. |
| Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Power Automate allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. |
| Improper input validation in Microsoft Office Outlook allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Improper input validation in Microsoft AutoUpdate (MAU) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass, allowing a low impact to the integrity of the component. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must interact with the malicious content. Low privileges are required. |
| When an Apache CloudStack user-account creates a CKS-based Kubernetes cluster in a project, the API key and the secret key of the 'kubeadmin' user of the caller account are used to create the secret config in the CKS-based Kubernetes cluster. A member of the project who can access the CKS-based Kubernetes cluster, can also access the API key and secret key of the 'kubeadmin' user of the CKS cluster's creator's account. An attacker who's a member of the project can exploit this to impersonate and perform privileged actions that can result in complete compromise of the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of resources owned by the creator's account.
CKS users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.19.3.0 or 4.20.1.0, which fixes this issue.Updating Existing Kubernetes Clusters in ProjectsA service account should be created for each project to provide limited access specifically for Kubernetes cluster providers and autoscaling. Follow the steps below to create a new service account, update the secret inside the cluster, and regenerate existing API and service keys:1. Create a New Service AccountCreate a new account using the role "Project Kubernetes Service Role" with the following details:
Account Name
kubeadmin-<FIRST_EIGHT_CHARACTERS_OF_PROJECT_ID>
First Name
Kubernetes
Last Name
Service User
Account Type
0 (Normal User)
Role ID
<ID_OF_SERVICE_ROLE>
2. Add the Service Account to the ProjectAdd this account to the project where the Kubernetes cluster(s) are hosted.
3. Generate API and Secret KeysGenerate API Key and Secret Key for the default user of this account.
4. Update the CloudStack Secret in the Kubernetes ClusterCreate a temporary file `/tmp/cloud-config` with the following data:
api-url = <API_URL> # For example: <MS_URL>/client/api
api-key = <SERVICE_USER_API_KEY>
secret-key = <SERVICE_USER_SECRET_KEY>
project-id = <PROJECT_ID>
Delete the existing secret using kubectl and Kubernetes cluster config:
./kubectl --kubeconfig kube.conf -n kube-system delete secret cloudstack-secret
Create a new secret using kubectl and Kubernetes cluster config:
./kubectl --kubeconfig kube.conf -n kube-system create secret generic cloudstack-secret --from-file=/tmp/cloud-config
Remove the temporary file:
rm /tmp/cloud-config5. Regenerate API and Secret KeysRegenerate the API and secret keys for the original user account that was used to create the Kubernetes cluster. |
