| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The Linux kernel before 3.12, when UDP Fragmentation Offload (UFO) is enabled, does not properly initialize certain data structures, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and system crash) or possibly gain privileges via a crafted application that uses the UDP_CORK option in a setsockopt system call and sends both short and long packets, related to the ip_ufo_append_data function in net/ipv4/ip_output.c and the ip6_ufo_append_data function in net/ipv6/ip6_output.c. |
| The ipc_rcu_putref function in ipc/util.c in the Linux kernel before 3.10 does not properly manage a reference count, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (memory consumption or system crash) via a crafted application. |
| net/ipv6/ip6_output.c in the Linux kernel through 3.11.4 does not properly determine the need for UDP Fragmentation Offload (UFO) processing of small packets after the UFO queueing of a large packet, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and system crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via network traffic that triggers a large response packet. |
| Interpretation conflict in drivers/md/dm-snap-persistent.c in the Linux kernel through 3.11.6 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information or modify data via a crafted mapping to a snapshot block device. |
| ext/xml/xml.c in PHP before 5.3.27 does not properly consider parsing depth, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted document that is processed by the xml_parse_into_struct function. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| ** REJECT ** This CVE ID has been rejected by its CNA as it was not a security issue. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2023-4206, CVE-2023-4207, CVE-2023-4208. Reason: This record is a duplicate of CVE-2023-4206, CVE-2023-4207, CVE-2023-4208. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2023-4206, CVE-2023-4207, CVE-2023-4208 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. Duplicate of CVE-2023-4863. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2023-3141. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2023-3141. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2023-3141 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2023-22652. Reason: This record is a duplicate of CVE-2023-22652. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2023-22652 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-29457. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2021-29457. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-29457 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. |