| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Improper input validation in SEV-SNP could allow a malicious hypervisor to read or overwrite guest memory potentially leading to data leakage or data corruption. |
| JFrog Artifactory versions below 7.90.6, 7.84.20, 7.77.14, 7.71.23, 7.68.22, 7.63.22, 7.59.23, 7.55.18 are vulnerable to Improper Input Validation that could potentially lead to cache poisoning. |
| The readObject method in the DiskFileItem class in Apache Tomcat and JBoss Web, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.1.0 and Red Hat JBoss Portal 6.0.0, allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a NULL byte in a file name in a serialized instance, a similar issue to CVE-2013-2186. NOTE: this issue is reportedly disputed by the Apache Tomcat team, although Red Hat considers it a vulnerability. The dispute appears to regard whether it is the responsibility of applications to avoid providing untrusted data to be deserialized, or whether this class should inherently protect against this issue |
| When the device is shared, the homepage module are before 2.19.0 in eWeLink Cloud Service allows Secondary user to take over devices as primary user via sharing unnecessary device-sensitive information. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE is marked as INVALID and not a bug |
| Non Security Issue. See the binutils security policy for more details, https://sourceware.org/cgit/binutils-gdb/tree/binutils/SECURITY.txt |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate is unused by its CNA. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This CVE has been rejected as it was incorrectly assigned. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-11813. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2018-11813. Notes: All CVE users should reference [ID] instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-3739. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2018-3739. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-3739 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-11206. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2018-11206. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-11206 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
